Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kr9Ww-00011t-EP for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kr9Wv-0006AI-Bm for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:58:29 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kr9Wv-0006A6-5W for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:58:29 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([70.109.60.50]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kr9Wt-0006Nh-7v for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:58:28 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CF465F799; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:58:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:58:26 -0500 From: Stephen Frost To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Thomas Munro , k.yudhveer@gmail.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #16079: Question Regarding the BUG #16064 Message-ID: <20201221005825.GQ16415@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <16079-29e9c038e1463751@postgresql.org> <20191028154754.GS6962@tamriel.snowman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y10lCialaRXjIaJg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --Y10lCialaRXjIaJg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:42 AM Thomas Munro wro= te: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:48 AM Stephen Frost wrot= e: > > > Uh, the user's credentials certainly are sent to the PG server. > > > > Perhaps we should log a warning when PostgreSQL has received a > > password over the network without SSL. Perhaps we should log another > > warning when PostgreSQL has sent a password over the network without > > SSL. >=20 > For the old plaintext "password" method, we log a warning when we parse t= he > configuration file. >=20 > Maybe we should do the same for LDAP (and RADIUS)? This seems like a bett= er > place to put it than to log it at every time it's received? A dollar short and a year late, but ... +1. Thanks, Stephen --Y10lCialaRXjIaJg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJf3/MxAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVZ9sP/1fBbrYnM0hfUz3vLdC11+Hy P/oUEyva677+ItxZRv49P8AFb8I/XOa/2DR8fZTR4NoowlLKkJ9OEix03Iyiz00/ XySMwLrwOVHkCVC4g1Mz2jY8/vZlENmbB95MYlRhCXy8vzmMtYBwLJ/dxJjeOG36 JF5Bsx9FYqo8pfoR32U0EKyx/9pWCu/R1o/W+hIsOdERJgDd1a/iCQ6sJUHiIBLL ePa/XeDmda8Wm0sAdXi487xcrNTmmuqO8W4Mf/ofM7tYqQ9WTX1kDCY+rJKMpt5z 0+XdxClSrVxpvalOsFwVTPpzGYE0d2Z5t5Pm3JYXIuWsOgECdM8t8lAexY18bn9K OIf+s7obxhFCKbN4mtUU9YRnXnO6TQK0sc7XqtI9CmETetV5FabTOveeo0G9i+Zz 1NyEzW6U6o/pMQuZi4fi4CdZugm1V86oQCY/4+4NIQn/y7OhchOPX8DnHz3SeA5F 2KADdoud1DperOVnnM4of2OU32vU49FCcnwf8XL1jLtdKD6G4tZu/Ad6ACg2vzR/ 649NzJhv01s5auNqUsMwQ9C2yNuJ1YkJGm6QJigCSwvBRtV+ZnvNS2mx5HLlOcYB 9RX0p1HLlkv6rk/RJeyh8okEZo3U91sVLxPcUHKG1EPwQoVUH50pYEjb8ibIj68G sprwidrX4slqjm+zSLXF =AFJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y10lCialaRXjIaJg--