Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb4jh-0000xO-Dh for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:09:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb4jg-0001CB-49 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:09:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb4ge-0006Pc-H0 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:06:20 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb4gc-0002em-8V for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:06:19 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lb4ga-00039T-Lh; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:06:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:06:16 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Noah Misch , neverov.max@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16939: Plural interval for negative singular Message-ID: <20210426170616.GV7629@momjian.us> References: <16939-cceeb03fb72736ee@postgresql.org> <20210323160336.GE579@momjian.us> <20210425115726.GA2353095@rfd.leadboat.com> <20210426163116.GR7629@momjian.us> <2266336.1619455534@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210426165435.GT7629@momjian.us> <2267469.1619456564@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2267469.1619456564@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 01:02:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:45:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I agree with Noah's opinion that we should stick to the historical > >> behavior in the interval I/O functions. There is not enough solidity > >> in the "this is grammatically wrong" argument to justify taking any > >> risk of application breakage, and it seems like there is some risk of > >> that there. > > > Are you saying we should revert the patch and leave the plurals > > inconsistent in different places? > > As far as the changes in datetime.c and interval.c are concerned, > yes. I don't care too much about what you did in fe-print.c, Well, we should then add a comment that this is inconsistent but should not be changed. > although TBH that case should be unreachable shouldn't it? > When would PQntuples() return -1? I changed that just for consistency with other calls, in case it is ever copied somewhere else. > (I shy gently away from the fact that that fe-print.c code is > relentlessly untranslatable.) Again, if we revert, we should document is via a C comment. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.