Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFRpf-00051z-Mp for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:26:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFRpe-0006P7-J0 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:26:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFRpe-0006Oy-Ak for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:26:46 +0000 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFRpX-000558-Q3 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:26:45 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764D332020B3; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:26:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anarazel.de; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=l50oUH9uj4MPa7tZzj50MGMbuYr1FHeJ9OYnfq EXiCI=; b=kOq7iY92xgRKCZDwJt7JCoEHDT4aoY+ie409n3t6HfUmGAaVMNqfIP YlPegJ8nv+e6iuXFrLBFKoh4VobD0CmQFv1xQwnj7iA42bIfUx6P7HlflsFBfrpW YWMki/Ts0SWaz05JuMTHAfJ6yLwVhi/qwApFDWcaF7gcJnUcLW0baUnwrSFgzpVQ qx5z7QcS+kFEZlr68d+JgvT/8NzdgkIDnWbJI8jUxgimpqkswilIuAwIeXtAXJCF lGMQZSNUKo+G1ixoQ8SHzHbpkXpxZwbcowrv1kjDVvV/JceMP4VjM4/+Z3iwpAC1 YHi6qTdh4yBcV8g4cjIl1doR/Zy5Sskg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=l50oUH9uj4MPa7tZz j50MGMbuYr1FHeJ9OYnfqEXiCI=; b=kAxm95tLgFwo4Gls68Aq5of7MRdgDLzvo L6hKZBmy+sVwShGjLgYB/ku8UnAFFsLCDRrVm2JMhiH8tUD8ManFf8WZc+Rr5V3T /Ye0B70+BRfMlcgmFA5Xaw7dOD6/oEsmxLsn/NoudrhWaaS8neK9YN0cGlwCrmBQ VeoZEdTq9PLcW/OO6MDdbSKtzgkiO6cFejQrXWx/EpJqdkTgVYH13TRNUADHlrh4 DPcQlq0GzSxsvyvtzpTDFEnfOj73TCn7oKeMyfXav/kvAJ1V2jYgwattxdnLCeop j3kAf5rv4Paei8yDV7Jzgx3hAZcvsYeLM2kM8FfC/BfFkw5BkPxKQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrgeeigdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheptehnughrvghs ucfhrhgvuhhnugcuoegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepudekhfekleeugeevteehleffffejgeelueduleeffeeutdelffeujeffhfeu ffdunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprg hnughrvghssegrnhgrrhgriigvlhdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:26:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:26:35 -0800 From: Andres Freund To: Tom Lane Cc: Thomas Munro , byavuz81@gmail.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists , Heikki Linnakangas , Michael Paquier Subject: Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 Message-ID: <20220203022635.jjl356endsypm3za@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <17391-304f81bcf724b58b@postgresql.org> <20220202213900.h7paogmcge2rtls6@alap3.anarazel.de> <131329.1643851912@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <131329.1643851912@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, On 2022-02-02 20:31:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > BTW, I also reproduced something that seems odd from the OP's > postmaster logs: there are what seem a quite excessive number > of checkpoints happening during these tests. That happens > on my Linux box too, so it's not an OpenBSD issue. It looks > like there are two per CREATE DATABASE --- I could understand > one maybe, but why two? I think that's unfortunately normal. There's two RequestCheckpoint()s in createdb(). We should optimize that someday... Greetings, Andres Freund