Feedback-ID: ia2694551:Fastmail
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 21:34:50 +0200
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	=?utf-8?B?0J/QtdGC0YrRgCDQodC70LDQstC+0LI=?= <pet.slavov@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing
 REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Message-ID: <202205311934.c4poxkuoy3xm@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAH2-WznofpKtx=V4SpDtXiy+uey+pFi0xQGrmGVV4OmSZ8F9-w@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202205311934.c4poxkuoy3xm%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-May-31, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> The assertion failure takes place in heapam_index_build_range_scan(),
> at the point that it is called by amcheck itself -- during an
> opportunistic prune that occurs in passing. This is the specific
> assertion that fails:
> 
> https://github.com/x4m/postgres_g/blob/09d76bdc2528b476ef2f04c793061dcbf23372b5/src/backend/access/heap/pruneheap.c#L762
> 
> Another bug in HEAD definitely seems possible here, but it's hard to
> know without careful testing. The failure that we see is limited to
> the "macOS - Monterey" run, which only fails on this new test.

Actually, it fails on Linux, FreeBSD and macOS -- it's only that one
particular version of the test fails in macOS and the other fails in the
other two systems.  But both of those failures occur in this assertion.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/