Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sS1AM-00384i-4t for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 21:17:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sS19M-000oWx-BJ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 21:16:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sS19M-000oWp-1z for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 21:16:24 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sS19B-001cT6-EK for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 21:16:23 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-703ba2477bdso627247a34.2 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leadboat.com; s=google; t=1720732571; x=1721337371; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=6SYdmLwQU7D25ljeYRFL743deLQ6UDZhSS1tc1uMgN8=; b=PzlTuwPnhvlCRe2BQoXf2zZ/thYqFWsrDw9UUkWSXBeaR9oesNkYbphsIf3zjorWZ5 UNSyctMDddcEgwkHT71zScHYcYO7OXzKyVcV0Q6IsOcDUY5ryU5XVvZH9RHdj2psV0DT 4NfW3l/bKkLCUNDBcLT2FfMsXmKpvIC5U44nI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720732571; x=1721337371; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6SYdmLwQU7D25ljeYRFL743deLQ6UDZhSS1tc1uMgN8=; b=Fbpg6l4WR+bcqQ8udXuD4uqd8sbhR2os0X2IM7sKn8Lrw5ZmR7+lV13Z8e0sfkMBqB FS0PItsa7Ym23jPmM85/Ewbu2G1ux8k2LmQQhURGabOkAHMPDwU3Ljp8ewkG/OY0Cqp0 uWxcQX/GXTudfECETEDATzc5Ht+iwntk9SyARNNjxSQpwUF3X88LfnUbF5vWN5rcoZ0s vM/V+WlnjENmML8HVx6CoVb4G9b7ppABhdHlza+goso7TPYXajt02jPbp6qPtmSgWHEP U3FvDEknE75DHVUcTgNx+ORhEq73L8ieBmXvEmVNDLgizDBbbJF+qoOX6HNyq0OtysO7 CJdA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWm1iz7Q85nosDSTi91kWS+t4Bu85Ps8ZKdOBJFwBVGCKmq8zBN+YMdiVF0nK2t9l+ZXS3FYYW9bjZLm0mxBDUnyL0L/jCE8mHzfdqTwsM+ X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywvl3KlwTfbsu0cp8svSrSRvQsYwTZ9XvvpPUBAhgu+jb603KdH HgezrqTyP+pn3NvVdOFgMcSLzPTRmOW/1K6/I327jx96WWbv1J6r82vfQYHeMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6z8qu8g+V9ozfcgZB7Vs3NQO9fB4q7TRtpdL8jl9NEnKDnI9T7J8K9ev2J4Q/T1+PKtR+Aw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1607:b0:708:b419:d28f with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-708b419d48amr1938122a34.30.1720732571173; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2600:1702:a20:5750::48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 46e09a7af769-70374fc0a2esm1330207a34.50.2024.07.11.14.16.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:16:08 -0700 From: Noah Misch To: Melanie Plageman Cc: Bowen Shi , Andres Freund , Robert Haas , Matthias van de Meent , Peter Geoghegan , Alexander Lakhin , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae Message-ID: <20240711211608.21.nmisch@google.com> References: <20240518222311.6b@rfd.leadboat.com> <20240520204818.42.nmisch@google.com> <20240625193740.dc.nmisch@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 05:23:52PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > I am nervous about the test flaking on the buildfarm. But I did > the best I could to try to make it stable. I think keeping it as a > separate commit should be easiest in case we have to revert it? Whether one uses a separate commit or not, it's easy to remove a new test. I think either way is fine. We've not typically committed tests separately.