Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iILal-0003Oy-4e for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:42:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iILaj-0000Yt-Im for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:42:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iILaj-0000Yk-Aj for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:42:01 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iILag-0000mp-PF for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:42:00 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x99NfsFo020266; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:41:54 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Tomas Vondra cc: buschmann@nidsa.net, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12 In-reply-to: <20191009232836.jg77wccqwy5fgs6s@development> References: <16045-673e8fa6b5ace196@postgresql.org> <20191009132436.uugh4r3be6vw6ex4@development> <20191009135907.km2b5nrzflcz6xey@development> <20191009141841.my6k44wfiaquj3ks@development> <20191009230759.ge66neof5qj627a2@development> <19314.1570663125@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20191009232836.jg77wccqwy5fgs6s@development> Comments: In-reply-to Tomas Vondra message dated "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 01:28:36 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20264.1570664514.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:41:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20265.1570664514@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Tomas Vondra writes: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 07:18:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Fortunately, there should be close to zero people with user tables >> depending on sql_identifier. I think we should just add a test in >> pg_upgrade that refuses to upgrade if there are any such columns. >> It won't be the first such restriction. > Hmmm, yeah. I agree the number of people using sql_identifier in user > tables is low, but OTOH we got this report within a week after release, > so maybe it's higher than we think. True. > Another option would be to teach pg_upgrade to switch the columns to > 'text' or 'varchar', not sure if that's possible or how much work would > that be. I think it'd be a mess --- the actual hacking would have to happen in pg_dump, I think, and it'd be a kluge because pg_dump doesn't normally understand what server version its output is going to. So we'd more or less have to control it through a new pg_dump switch that pg_upgrade would use. Ick. Also, even if we did try to silently convert such columns that way, I bet we'd get other bug reports about "why'd my columns suddenly change type?". So I'd rather force the user to be involved. regards, tom lane