Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdEkO-0005xC-EN for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:06:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdEkM-0007rD-VE for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:06:02 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdEkM-0007r6-NL for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:06:02 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdEkL-0000dt-Bb for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:06:02 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5IE5wBn002049; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:05:58 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: krujkov@gmail.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #15857: Parallel Hash Join makes join instead of exists In-reply-to: References: <15857-d1ba2a64bce0795e@postgresql.org> <20972.1560863822@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 01:56:40 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2047.1560866758.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:05:58 -0400 Message-ID: <2048.1560866758@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > Thanks for the fast review. Updated. I'll default to waiting until > after I see the tags for the release that's in progress unless you > think it should be included. OK to push as far as I'm concerned. I am not expecting to have to re-wrap given the lack of packagers complaints so far, and if we do re-wrap, I'd be OK with including this fix. regards, tom lane