Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHudJ-0003FI-1X for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:27:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jHudH-0005IT-Ky for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:27:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jHudH-0005IM-8X for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:27:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHudE-0000QL-L1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:27:06 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02RJR1qJ020976; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:27:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Hamid Akhtar cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan In-reply-to: <158533333892.13411.4384511509626622379.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org> References: <16040-eaacad11fecfb198@postgresql.org> <158533333892.13411.4384511509626622379.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Hamid Akhtar message dated "Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:18 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20974.1585337221.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:27:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20975.1585337221@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Hamid Akhtar writes: > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > Implements feature: tested, passed > Spec compliant: tested, passed > Documentation: tested, passed > All good with this patch. Thanks for testing! Anybody have an objection to cramming this into v13? It is a bit late, but it seems like a performance bug fix ... regards, tom lane