Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msrCC-0005qH-Qy for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:52:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msrCB-0006Lo-OZ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:52:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msrCB-0006LZ-GB for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:52:39 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msrC9-0007bL-BZ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:52:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1B2IqY962117836; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:52:34 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: researcherhpc@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17307: Performance deviation between the multiple iterations (NOPM & TPM values). In-reply-to: <17307-45aac4924bf83586@postgresql.org> References: <17307-45aac4924bf83586@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Thu, 02 Dec 2021 05:24:23 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2117834.1638471154.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:52:34 -0500 Message-ID: <2117835.1638471154@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > NOPM values captured with HammerDB-v4.3 scripts (schema_tpcc.tcl and > test_tpcc.tcl ) for multiple trails. > The expected performance deviation between multiple trials should be less > than 2% According to who? Even if you'd provided an easily reproducible example, I doubt we'd accept this as a bug. Adding more sessions does not have zero cost. regards, tom lane