Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1uSft3-00BWqi-Qp
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:50:49 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1uSft1-003TVi-5u
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:50:47 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1uSft0-003TUN-SD
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:50:47 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1uSfsz-0035uQ-2N
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:50:46 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 55KHofdP2139687;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:50:41 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
cc: maximilian.chrzan@here.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18959: Name collisions of expression indexes during parallel
 Index creations on a pratitioned table.
In-reply-to: 
 <CAFiTN-t0LFgiHgD7DvHZtCxL46X3qdARAmYoLREVizH_YyEn6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org>
 <CAFiTN-vB9UHF0yJxFynKuFiLkw094z7KLyDw4EAfUeaj1pZ00g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1081051.1750260111@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1138732.1750265195@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAFiTN-tVuS7pWbSZtCh5kAsGihen5ESpirS811KNFPCgLBm1WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1802526.1750366786@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAFiTN-t0LFgiHgD7DvHZtCxL46X3qdARAmYoLREVizH_YyEn6A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:59:10 +0530"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2139685.1750441841.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:50:41 -0400
Message-ID: <2139686.1750441841@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2139686.1750441841%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, that makes sense to apply in v19 because of user visible behavior
> changes in index names.  I agree the SnapshotDirty patch can give
> relief for this case for back branches.

OK, I pushed the SnapshotDirty patch.  The other patch still seems
to apply over it, so I won't repost that unless the cfbot thinks
differently.

			regards, tom lane