Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lrsnv-000835-06
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:19 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lrsnt-0005LN-Vx
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:17 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lrsnt-0005LF-PZ
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:17 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lrsnr-0007FL-BI
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:16 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 15C1pDmG2140753;
	Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:51:13 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, sbernikov@gmail.com,
        PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying
 update of row that dose not exist in target partiti
In-reply-to: <YMQSkJ+yW1zATYCD@paquier.xyz>
References: <YMMCFPuQwO6sEcJ+@paquier.xyz>
 <CA+HiwqF0xi2KmPYKPPCtcgQ2vnjQrfm5cdY50VRC+S_s1M4KvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1881335.1623423667@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2058966.1623442520@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YMP+Gx2S8meYYHW4@paquier.xyz> <2136546.1623457890@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YMQEO1EYRQX1cWGQ@paquier.xyz> <2138662.1623460441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YMQOd4RvCq1ui19U@paquier.xyz> <2139835.1623461825@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <YMQSkJ+yW1zATYCD@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:49:04 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2140751.1623462673.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:51:13 -0400
Message-ID: <2140752.1623462673@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2140752.1623462673%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Ah, right.  That would be after "DELETE FROM tab_full_pk" in
> 001_rep_changes.pl and after "DELETE FROM tab1" in 001_rep_changes.pl
> run on the subscribers, then.  Would you prefer doing the change?

No, go right ahead.

			regards, tom lane