Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlZN4-0001C8-QU for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:44:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlZN3-00064r-M7 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:44:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlZN3-00064k-B0 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:44:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hlZMx-0008Dk-3X for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:44:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x6BDi7QY021923; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:44:07 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Michael Paquier , Alvaro Herrera , Andres Freund , Marko Tiikkaja , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logical decoding client after creating a slot In-reply-to: References: <20190709201557.y5yt57z2za2hu6l7@alap3.anarazel.de> <20190709214630.GA15632@alvherre.pgsql> <20190710235830.GB4500@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:21:39 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21921.1562852647.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:44:07 -0400 Message-ID: <21922.1562852647@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > We've tried that once, and I think even twice, and failed miserably at any > form of agreement. But we could certainly try again :) I thought we *did* have an agreement, to wit using Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ to link to relevant mail thread(s). Some people use more tags but that seems inessential to me. regards, tom lane