Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tNZYD-000hdx-Hp
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:31:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tNZYC-002uTr-Gd
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:31:56 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1tNZYC-002uTi-88
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:31:55 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1tNZY9-000DUB-4V
	for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:31:55 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4BHFVopt2236660;
	Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:31:50 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: myzhen <zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: to_timestamp function calculation error
In-reply-to: <4833ac30.18d0.193d475b6d3.Coremail.zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
References: <4833ac30.18d0.193d475b6d3.Coremail.zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
Comments: In-reply-to myzhen <zhenmingyang@yeah.net>
	message dated "Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:51:44 +0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2236658.1734449510.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:31:50 -0500
Message-ID: <2236659.1734449510@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2236659.1734449510%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

myzhen <zhenmingyang@yeah.net> writes:
> When calling the to_timestamp function, if the actual parameter passed i=
s a negative year and you specify BC, this will cause to_timestamp to retu=
rn an AD date.

I believe this is intentional.

			regards, tom lane