Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ZVw-004A3d-5f for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 16:42:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ZVs-002MpC-Ie for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 16:42:29 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ZVs-002Mod-AB for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 16:42:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ZVq-001CQm-S2 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 May 2024 16:42:28 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 442GgPhe2241009; Thu, 2 May 2024 12:42:25 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: gkchinna.oracle@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18455: DST information is flagged wrongly In-reply-to: <2235698.1714666342@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <18455-1f7c5337666bbd1a@postgresql.org> <2219450.1714662503@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2235698.1714666342@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Thu, 02 May 2024 12:12:22 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2241007.1714668145.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 12:42:25 -0400 Message-ID: <2241008.1714668145@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Ah ... having now refreshed my memory, the answer is that RHEL > and Apple are distributing "rearguard" tzdata files, whereas > ours are built with the main ("vanguard") data model. Further to that ... on recent Fedora I get $ zdump -v Europe/Dublin | grep 2024 Europe/Dublin Sun Mar 31 00:59:59 2024 UT =3D Sun Mar 31 00:59:59 2024 GM= T isdst=3D1 gmtoff=3D0 Europe/Dublin Sun Mar 31 01:00:00 2024 UT =3D Sun Mar 31 02:00:00 2024 IS= T isdst=3D0 gmtoff=3D3600 Europe/Dublin Sun Oct 27 00:59:59 2024 UT =3D Sun Oct 27 01:59:59 2024 IS= T isdst=3D0 gmtoff=3D3600 Europe/Dublin Sun Oct 27 01:00:00 2024 UT =3D Sun Oct 27 01:00:00 2024 GM= T isdst=3D1 gmtoff=3D0 So Red Hat is indeed moving in the direction of adopting the vanguard data; they just haven't pulled that trigger yet in RHEL. regards, tom lane