Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf7dt-0002hy-IT for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 18:22:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf7ds-0005Mx-9H for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 18:22:52 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf7dr-0005Mq-P3 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 18:22:51 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf7dn-00083p-0i for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 18:22:50 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x03IMOXx023620; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 13:22:24 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Hugh Ranalli , Michael Paquier , Peter Eisentraut , thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com, Daniel Verite , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters In-reply-to: <201901031819.hi4hjki2pzr5@alvherre.pgsql> References: <201901031819.hi4hjki2pzr5@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:19:58 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23618.1546539744.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 13:22:24 -0500 Message-ID: <23619.1546539744@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > I think the point is that if the committee updates with a further > version of the file, how do you find the new version? We need a URL > that's one step removed from the final file, so that we can see if we > need to update it. Maybe we can provide both URLs for convenience. +1. Could be phrased along the lines of "documents are at URL1, currently synced with URL2" so that it's clear that URL2 should be updated when we re-sync with a newer release. regards, tom lane