Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1sDtXV-00FswM-2L
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 22:18:58 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1sDtXU-008CFn-Sq
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 22:18:56 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1sDtXU-008CFe-KL
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 22:18:56 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1sDtXS-003A6e-8V
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2024 22:18:55 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 452MIpm92365648;
	Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:18:51 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
cc: Mor Lehr <mor.lehr@deel.com>,
        "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise
 syntax error
In-reply-to: 
 <CAKFQuwZJUc8pqt402u9VjAEgGEMR-Rbu2b5nieeJ_bUzQChrXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALyvM2bp_CXMH_Gyq87pmHJRuZDEhV40u9VP8rX=CAnEt2wUXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFQuwZJUc8pqt402u9VjAEgGEMR-Rbu2b5nieeJ_bUzQChrXA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sun, 02 Jun 2024 09:19:12 -0600"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2365646.1717366731.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 18:18:51 -0400
Message-ID: <2365647.1717366731@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2365647.1717366731%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> I think you just wrote the equivalent of:
> l_cnt := (select 1 as delete from foo3 where id=1);
> Which is a valid query.

Still another example of the folly of letting AS be optional.
I don't suppose we can ever undo that though.

			regards, tom lane