Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2EJR-0002wg-J2 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2EJQ-0007q1-HU for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:50:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2EJQ-0007pt-Av for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:50:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2EJM-0003pv-SD for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:50:35 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16AEoTJp2377741; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:50:29 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Adrian Ho , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x In-reply-to: References: <1677203.1625582865@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1860066.1625677051@sss.pgh.pa.us> <68D22062-EC78-47C5-BC46-EF2F77193E19@yesql.se> <2040197.1625774127@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2229967.1625848816@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sat, 10 Jul 2021 20:56:17 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2377739.1625928629.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:50:29 -0400 Message-ID: <2377740.1625928629@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 12:40:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Done that way. > This broke LDAPS, and the regression tests of src/test/ldap/. Elver > is one animal complaining, but I am able to reproduce this failure on > my own Debian laptop: Oh, that's interesting. elver's failure seems to be because it's now deciding it doesn't HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE. However, on my RHEL8 machine the current configure coding is still finding ldap_initialize; so I'd assumed this was something BSD-specific. If you're seeing it on Debian then I'm really confused about what the problem is. regards, tom lane