Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz5Lv-0008SC-0F for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:31:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz5Lt-0000EI-Pl for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:31:05 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz5Lt-0000Ct-Ex for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:31:05 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hz5Lr-0007NL-8T for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:31:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7HKV1c9024758; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:31:01 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: jungleboogie0@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'FD_SETSIZE' In-reply-to: <15964-c1753bdfed722e04@postgresql.org> References: <15964-c1753bdfed722e04@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:06:33 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24756.1566073861.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:31:01 -0400 Message-ID: <24757.1566073861@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > I'm trying to compile Postgresql from master on my OpenBSD machine, but I'm > getting a build failure here: > vacuumdb.c:184:26: error: use of undeclared identifier 'FD_SETSIZE' > if (concurrentCons > FD_SETSIZE - 1) > ^ Hmm, it seems somebody removed the "#include " from that file, which was a pretty not-bright idea. But I wonder why the OpenBSD machines in the buildfarm aren't complaining. regards, tom lane