Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gO7ZA-0006sk-D5 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 20:51:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gO7Z7-00056Y-T0 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 20:51:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gO7Z7-00056F-JG for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 20:51:41 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gO7Z5-0002c7-03 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 20:51:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wAHKpaFq002511; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:51:36 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: ertugrul9090@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15511: Drop table error "invalid argument" In-reply-to: <15511-1d8b6a0bc874112f@postgresql.org> References: <15511-1d8b6a0bc874112f@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= message dated "Sat, 17 Nov 2018 20:32:27 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2509.1542487896.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:51:36 -0500 Message-ID: <2510.1542487896@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk =?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= writes: > Drop table error "HATA: vsnprintf failed: Invalid argument", error > code:"XX000" , PostgreSQL version..: "11.1" Hmm. Looking at snprintf.c, EINVAL could only be returned for an incorrect translated message (i.e. wrong use of %n$ notation), so it seems somebody fat-fingered a translation. We can infer that you're using the Turkish message set, but that doesn't help much to narrow down where the mistake is. What do you see if you do "set lc_messages = 'C'" and then repeat the failing command? regards, tom lane