Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1kvRRJ-0006dc-Vy
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:54:25 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1kvRRI-0006IR-Ul
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:54:24 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1kvRRI-0006IE-OW
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:54:24 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1kvRRG-0006J6-C3
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 20:54:24 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 101KsKqg2536620;
	Fri, 1 Jan 2021 15:54:20 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dana Burd <djburd@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16797: EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM timestamp) is not using local
 timezone
In-reply-to: 
 <CADYUPHMsqBMY_-+=ssJMgjQ=VQG=Zjm3Jvmq4Y5EFXZcCSPbKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <16797-f264b0b980b53b8b@postgresql.org>
 <2396654.1609354902@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADYUPHNmh120OVhgkr897+SAyHdPm8=nj+mnwcY9d-fyWMJLSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2405485.1609363754@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADYUPHOhiP0R7BbFwepsfsuD+d0B3jH4zkAZjOogzGtuR_dg9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <2527205.1609521492@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADYUPHMsqBMY_-+=ssJMgjQ=VQG=Zjm3Jvmq4Y5EFXZcCSPbKg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dana Burd <djburd@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 01 Jan 2021 14:14:20 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2536618.1609534460.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 15:54:20 -0500
Message-ID: <2536619.1609534460@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk

Dana Burd <djburd@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 12:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps a better phrasing is "for date and timestamp values, the nomina=
l
>> number of seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00, without regard to timezone
>> or daylight-savings rules".

> That phrasing makes sense.

Sounds good, done here:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpostgresql.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D4=
d3f03f42227bb351c2021a9ccea2fff9c023cfc

Also see

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpostgresql.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D3=
19f4d54e82d15d4a0c3f4cc1328c40dba024b5c

			regards, tom lane