Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwU9m-000323-Ir for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:14:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwU9m-0000Nu-5Q for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:14:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwU9l-0000Ni-RG; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:14:45 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwU9i-0006eT-TC; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:14:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8PEEbKN025810; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:14:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: balazs@obiserver.hu, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? In-reply-to: References: <20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <15165.1506116768@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3cece400-af56-7145-2e65-f044de1b0b68@2ndQuadrant.com> <28968.1506136792@sss.pgh.pa.us> <24380.1506179805@sss.pgh.pa.us> <16272.1506189656@sss.pgh.pa.us> <928f5974-151f-0273-0221-fac213e7624f@2ndQuadrant.com> <19137.1506196325@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4942e2c0-3302-f496-d4c1-a967f77d0143@2ndQuadrant.com> <25662.1506204381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9479302a-09b8-4264-f9c4-514b65f18547@2ndQuadrant.com> <18127.1506285450@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2770f70a-5977-3fa1-1065-11b4cc69f07f@2ndQuadrant.com> <23438.1506294409@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:42:25 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25808.1506348877.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:14:37 -0400 Message-ID: <25809.1506348877@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 09/24/2017 07:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I think we should just stop with the blacklist test for v10, >> and then see if we still get complaints (and exactly what they're >> about) so that we can judge how much more work the problem deserves. >> It's still ahead of where we were in previous releases, and ahead of >> where we'd be if we end up reverting the patch altogether. > That's pretty much what I was saying. Oh ... I did not think we were on the same page, because your patch didn't include removal of the same-transaction heuristic. It'd be sensible to do that as a separate patch, though, to make it easier to put back if we decide we do want it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs