From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>,
        Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
        masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
In-reply-to: <20200423235402.GJ33034@paquier.xyz>
References: <20200422175824.637bda91@firost> <20200422181717.491fb499@firost>
 <20200422234618.GI33034@paquier.xyz>
 <20200423.140546.1055476118690602079.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
 <20200423185953.5f8e5b8f@firost> <20200423235402.GJ33034@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:54:02 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <25920.1587694875.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:21:15 -0400
Message-ID: <25921.1587694875@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I have worked more on that using your v11, tweaked few comments in the
> new test parts for 9.5~10, and applied the whole.  Thanks all for your
> work.  I am keeping now an eye on the buildfarm.

Looks like the news is not good :-(

I see that my own florican is one of the failing critters, though
it failed only on HEAD which seems odd.  Any suggestions what to
look for?

			regards, tom lane