Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx9rn-0008C6-S3 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:37:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx9rm-00044s-FV for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:37:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx9rm-00044j-7I for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:37:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx9rj-00086H-9Z for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:37:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1BEFbHYK259549; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:37:17 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: kbarber@salesforce.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17337: Segmentation fault on updating row with ltree GIST index In-reply-to: <17337-6264099dfbeb4705@postgresql.org> References: <17337-6264099dfbeb4705@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:19:46 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <259547.1639496237.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:37:17 -0500 Message-ID: <259548.1639496237@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > I've got a customer that was seeing a segfault whenever they were performing > an update operation on a table after an upgrade from Postgres 10 to 13.5. I > can't show all the data as this is private, but let me give you what details > I have. Any chance of creating a self-contained test case, perhaps with synthetic data? regards, tom lane