Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rX5Fm-008hbz-VL for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 20:07:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rX5Fm-00FegB-8I for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 20:07:42 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rX5Dt-00Fctc-Lm for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 20:05:45 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rX5Dq-005dQ7-Md for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 20:05:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 415K5cnM265024; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:05:39 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Christian Maurer cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18312: libpq: PQsetdbLogin() not thread-safe In-reply-to: <117784.1707146691@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <18312-bbbabc8113592b78@postgresql.org> <3154181.1706888936@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3222816.1706897982@sss.pgh.pa.us> <117784.1707146691@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:24:51 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <265022.1707163538.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:05:38 -0500 Message-ID: <265023.1707163538@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Christian Maurer writes: >> Would it be possible, that the patch you are aiming to make can be incl= uded in version 16.2? > I'm afraid we're a few days too late for that --- even if I had > a finished patch, the release freeze started two days ago. > It'll be in the May releases, instead. For the archives' sake --- I've posted a patch for this at [1]. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/264860.1707163416%40sss.pgh.pa.u= s