Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP4CW-0001qy-1Y for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:18:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP4CU-00048Z-VZ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:18:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP4CU-00048Q-NX for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:18:38 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pP4CS-0007co-HR for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:18:37 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 316GIZwZ2676719; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:18:35 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Francesco Tagliani cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17776: Connections are terminated unexpectedly sometimes In-reply-to: References: <17776-36d858c9afa20043@postgresql.org> <2665710.1675697999@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Francesco Tagliani message dated "Mon, 06 Feb 2023 23:58:38 +0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2676717.1675700315.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 11:18:35 -0500 Message-ID: <2676718.1675700315@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Francesco Tagliani writes: > I found some logs I don't understand. > ``` > 2023-02-05 00:37:16.858 UTC [1739876] [unknown]@[unknown] FATAL: > unsupported frontend protocol 65363.19778: server supports 3.0 to 3.0 > 2023-02-06 12:26:48.844 UTC [467480] [unknown]@[unknown] FATAL: > unsupported frontend protocol 16.0: server supports 3.0 to 3.0 > 2023-02-06 02:17:08.205 UTC [257863] [unknown]@[unknown] FATAL: > unsupported frontend protocol 65363.19778: server supports 3.0 to 3.0 > 2023-02-06 06:37:00.411 UTC [345467] [unknown]@[unknown] FATAL: > unsupported frontend protocol 0.0: server supports 3.0 to 3.0 > 2023-02-06 06:37:00.679 UTC [345468] [unknown]@[unknown] FATAL: > unsupported frontend protocol 255.255: server supports 3.0 to 3.0 > ``` Something port-scanning your server, perhaps? None of those protocol numbers match anything that Postgres-related code would use. regards, tom lane