From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru>
cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de>,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline
 (libpq_pipeline.c)
In-reply-to: <5ff4b743-b9ab-4406-92db-d6e00be2b301@postgrespro.ru>
References: <18960-09cd4a5100152e58@postgresql.org>
 <1181606.1750280943@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2790652.1750536063@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <5ff4b743-b9ab-4406-92db-d6e00be2b301@postgrespro.ru>
Comments: In-reply-to Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru>
	message dated "Sat, 21 Jun 2025 23:42:42 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2831374.1750542378.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:46:18 -0400
Message-ID: <2831375.1750542378@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2831375.1750542378%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> As I understand, you have leaks of 'res' when (PQresultStatus(res) != 
> status)

I don't think we really care about leaks when pg_fatal is called.
(If we do, there are a lot of others to worry about.)

> I spent the some time to fix a leaks in tests and PG itself here:
> https://github.com/dmitry-lipetsk/postgres/commits/D20250617_001-pg_master/

Ah, I did not know you were working on this.  Perhaps you can merge
what we've done.

			regards, tom lane