Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7UMN-0002ZS-Ig for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7UMN-0008Vw-0p for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:41:15 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7ULd-0007G7-RZ for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:40:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7ULW-0004np-Ma for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:40:29 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v9PMeKHZ028500; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:40:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: dcwatson@gmail.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #14872: libpq requires a home directory In-reply-to: References: <20171025200457.1471.34504@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <26003.1508967614@sss.pgh.pa.us> <27255.1508969436@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:35:17 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28498.1508971220.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:40:20 -0400 Message-ID: <28499.1508971220@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org Michael Paquier writes: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Poking around, it looks like parseServiceInfo's search for >> ~/.pg_service.conf has the same disease, but that code's been like that >> since 2010 --- I wonder why it's not causing you problems? Are you maybe >> setting PGSERVICEFILE to prevent that from failing? > Yeah... I was halfway into hacking a patch for that but got drowned > into other things until I saw your message. Are you working on a > patch? Yeah, I'm on it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs