From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
cc: Karen Huddleston <khuddleston@pivotal.io>, pgsql-bugs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
In-reply-to: <7b174b7a-4c94-f785-5c92-70bfc3a6d1db@iki.fi>
References: <20170614232259.1424.82774@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <22824.1497487336@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADewMCny3SSoUsWnXAT9sV=B2mj4HTY6gVCWgvm1AD35eg-LJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <23630.1497488548@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <7b174b7a-4c94-f785-5c92-70bfc3a6d1db@iki.fi>
Comments: In-reply-to Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
	message dated "Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:59:21 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <29133.1497532835.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:20:35 -0400
Message-ID: <29134.1497532835@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
>> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
>> documentation?

> I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been 
> deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone. 
> Would be one less hack to maintain.

I thought about that too, but I think it's a bit late for v10.
Wouldn't object to doing it in the v11 cycle.  In the meantime,
we'd need a fix for the back branches anyway.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs