Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tsot1-005qJ6-2c
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:10:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1tsosz-004fxn-ME
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:10:33 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1tsosz-004fxc-Dc
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:10:33 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1tsosv-002hwS-39
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2025 20:10:33 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 52DKAP6a2926484;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:10:25 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: ylshiyu@126.com
cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18840: Segmentation fault in executing select
 unnest(array(oidvector))
In-reply-to: <2557612.1741822653@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <18840-fbc9505f066e50d6@postgresql.org>
 <2557612.1741822653@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	message dated "Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:37:33 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2926482.1741896625.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:10:25 -0400
Message-ID: <2926483.1741896625@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2926483.1741896625%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

I wrote:
> The crash you found is sufficient reason to back-patch 0001, even
> though it changes results in some non-crash cases.  I'm less sure
> about whether to back-patch 0002.  If anyone can find a crash
> case involving ARRAY[], I think we should do so.

After sleeping on it I concluded that both changes should be
back-patched: if anyone were depending on ARRAY[] over int2vector
or oidvector, you'd think they'd have noticed and reported the
broken cases by now.  Hence, pushed as one patch.

			regards, tom lane