Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIHQt-0005CZ-Az for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:06:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIHQs-00055B-PW for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:06:30 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIHQs-000551-H7 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:06:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eIHQq-0004ub-7c for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:06:29 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vAOH6Qk8029658; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:06:26 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: christianmduta@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #14924: Subquery in VALUES inside recursive CTE In-reply-to: <20171124120836.1463.5310@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <20171124120836.1463.5310@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to christianmduta@gmail.com message dated "Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:08:36 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29656.1511543186.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:06:26 -0500 Message-ID: <29657.1511543186@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk christianmduta@gmail.com writes: > When working with recursive CTEs, I had the following happen: Thanks for the report! Seems not to be specific to CTEs: regression=# SELECT val.x FROM generate_series(1,10) AS s(i), LATERAL ( VALUES ((SELECT s.i + 1)), (s.i + 1) ) AS val(x) WHERE s.i < 10; ERROR: SubPlan found with no parent plan However, simplifying further, this works: regression=# SELECT val.x FROM generate_series(1,10) AS s(i), LATERAL ( VALUES ((SELECT 1 + 1)), (s.i + 1) ) AS val(x) WHERE s.i < 10; so it looks like it's the LATERAL reference inside the sub-select that is needed to trigger the bug. Same results back to 9.3 :-( regards, tom lane