Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPQIv-0005fq-92 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:50:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPQIu-0000af-8b for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:50:12 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPQIu-0000aQ-0B for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:50:12 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nPQIn-0003HC-Od for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:50:11 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 222Eo34i2977260; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:50:03 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: arjunshetty955@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17424: Build failed on disabled GNUC in Clang environment CFLAGS= -O2 -fgnuc-version=0 In-reply-to: <17424-75b750d162ef49f4@postgresql.org> References: <17424-75b750d162ef49f4@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Wed, 02 Mar 2022 10:50:35 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2977258.1646232603.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:50:03 -0500 Message-ID: <2977259.1646232603@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > -fgnuc-version flag used to disable __builtin_xx functions in > PotgreSQLv14.2 We do not support that, and I don't see any very good reason why we should. If you want to use some other compiler, then do so, but if you're on gcc then what's wrong with using its builtins? regards, tom lane