Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLaV-0001nk-Si for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:44:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLaT-0005Xe-0M for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:44:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLaS-0005S9-LS for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:44:32 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBLaQ-0005x0-Di for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:44:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x32FiQ5g030651; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:44:26 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: r.zharkov@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed In-reply-to: <20190402152925.kwt4xm7sfnay3t7t@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <15727-0be246e7d852d229@postgresql.org> <20190402152925.kwt4xm7sfnay3t7t@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:29:25 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30649.1554219866.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:44:26 -0400 Message-ID: <30650.1554219866@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: >> 2019-04-01 15:27:38.829 +07 [7524] STATEMENT: UPDATE pgbench_accounts SET >> abalance = 1 WHERE aid = 1; >> 2019-04-01 15:27:38.829 +07 [7524] PANIC: cannot abort transaction >> 400048276, it was already committed > But that's probably a separate issue. What that seems to indicate is that the "unexpected table_lock_tuple status" error was thrown during commit, which seems pretty odd. regards, tom lane