Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWanc-0007eB-Qs for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:32:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWanc-00089f-Di for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:32:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWanb-00086r-A6 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:32:35 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWanY-0007Re-Mq for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:32:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0Q3WSNS030722; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:32:28 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: pgsql@tomd.cc cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, Oleg Bartunov , Teodor Sigaev Subject: Re: BUG #14515: tsquery with only a negative term doesn't match empty tsvector In-reply-to: <20170126025524.1434.97828@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <20170126025524.1434.97828@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to pgsql@tomd.cc message dated "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:55:24 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30720.1485401548.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:32:28 -0500 Message-ID: <30721.1485401548@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org pgsql@tomd.cc writes: > Basically while `select 'somethingelse'::tsvector @@ '!foo'::tsquery` > returns true, `select ''::tsvector @@ '!foo'::tsquery` returns false, which > was surprising to me. Not sure about this. A plausible reading of '!foo' is "there is a lexeme that is not foo". But even if that was Oleg & Teodor's intention, I would not want to swear that the tsquery stuff is totally consistent about it ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs