Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0RbL-0000Oq-Jt for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:28:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0RbK-0008AD-DN for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:28:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0RbK-00082Y-1D for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:28:38 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i0RbH-0001U9-Pq for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:28:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7LESVT5030821; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:28:31 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Michael Paquier , Andres Freund , Dilip Kumar , jungleboogie0@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #15964: vacuumdb.c:187:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'FD_SETSIZE' In-reply-to: <20190821141636.GA26948@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20190821141636.GA26948@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:16:36 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30819.1566397711.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:28:31 -0400 Message-ID: <30820.1566397711@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > I guess the other possibility is that there exists an operating system > that returns file descriptors higher than its FD_SETSIZE, when some fds > below FD_SETSIZE are still available. Doesn't seem realistic. I think POSIX requires open() to select the lowest unused FD. Otherwise tricks like closing and reopening stdout wouldn't work reliably. regards, tom lane