Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wqZwf-002ILM-1z for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:25:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wqZwe-0032Gi-1y for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:25:52 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wqZwe-0032GY-19 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:25:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wqZwc-00000001Zve-2sSi for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:25:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 672HPlk0325749; Sun, 2 Aug 2026 13:25:48 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrey Rachitskiy cc: michaelmalis2@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #19595: Three memory-safety defects in src/backend/tsearch/spell.c (dictionary loader), PG 18.3 In-reply-to: References: <19595-7dc18b4e212c4757@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Andrey Rachitskiy message dated "Sun, 02 Aug 2026 12:29:48 +0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <325747.1785691547.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 13:25:47 -0400 Message-ID: <325748.1785691547@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andrey Rachitskiy writes: > Hi, Michael! > Patch attached. I pushed these code changes with one minor tweak: adjusting the new error message in NIImportOOAffixes to look more like the existing one about too many aliases. I left out the test cases. I don't think we need them, and I certainly don't think we want to install intentionally-broken files as sample data, as this patch would have done. regards, tom lane