Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1rajJi-00BBtI-Oo
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:30:50 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-bugs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1rajJg-00Fdbk-SA
	for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:30:48 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1rajJg-00Fdbc-Jw
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:30:48 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1rajJZ-007OX0-UM
	for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:30:46 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41FLUdmO3300729;
	Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:30:39 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com>
cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18343: Incorrect description in postgresql.conf for
 max_parallel_workers_per_gather
In-reply-to: 
 <CAArmHzRG4vi0rp8QetTWSeT0ZJj58qzn0jmvKXhZs_Y7c96bWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <18343-3a5e903d1d3692ab@postgresql.org>
 <3258900.1708012510@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAKFQuwajwK-BT40icc4EdosjNbXyF+otfdjFN9Q6uGMwC6tH7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAArmHzSFsTQ3bPX31zDHYSMz_PiHostGKPBp7qM+WU0uz3g6OQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <3270621.1708018293@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAKFQuwYVR+_T_1jXbgr09ELnHwVY+F2X2EWKduHLUeff9WmSGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAArmHzRG4vi0rp8QetTWSeT0ZJj58qzn0jmvKXhZs_Y7c96bWw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:29:06 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <3300727.1708032639.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:30:39 -0500
Message-ID: <3300728.1708032639@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-bugs>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3300728.1708032639%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Christopher Kline <kline.christopher@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:42 PM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "limited by" is indeed better IMO as well.

> Agreed.

Sold, I'll make it so.

			regards, tom lane