Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tD3a0-00FXTl-7Z for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:22:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tD3Zy-005dJ6-51 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:22:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tD3Zx-005dIy-Ss for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:22:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tD3Zr-002ap6-J1 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:22:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4AIFM9nA3302691; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:22:09 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Raghu Dev Ramaiah cc: "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Getting error while building PSQL 17.1 on AIX box In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Raghu Dev Ramaiah message dated "Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:55:45 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3302689.1731943329.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:22:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3302690.1731943329@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Raghu Dev Ramaiah writes: > I am getting error while building PSQL 17.1 on AIX box- AIX is not supported by Postgres 17.X. IBM has made noises about contributing the necessary effort and expertise to re-support it in 18.X and later ... but so far they haven't entirely followed through. See discussion here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CY5PR11MB63928CC05906F27FB10D74= D0FD322@CY5PR11MB6392.namprd11.prod.outlook.com Personally, I'd be much happier anyway if there were a grassroots, community-driven effort to deal with the problems that made us remove the AIX port. If you can be part of that, step right up. regards, tom lane