From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
cc: Joshua Uyehara <joshua.uyehara@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18178: New Restriction on "ON SELECT" rules on tables
In-reply-to: <8a0dd07e617563892e727a8119f9a34f86524eb1.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <18178-05534d7064044d2d@postgresql.org>
 <3027424.1698934802@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAOwkGA659Cyjc=1=X9pGhUnAxhq4xGvpj0PjNJ78cDY+aDWu=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <8a0dd07e617563892e727a8119f9a34f86524eb1.camel@cybertec.at>
Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
	message dated "Fri, 03 Nov 2023 16:21:10 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3305562.1699026811.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 11:53:31 -0400
Message-ID: <3305563.1699026811@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3305563.1699026811%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> But I wonder if it would not be better to completely remove ON SELECT fr=
om the CREATE RULE
> command.  Attached is a patch that does that.

I don't think this is a great idea.  There are perhaps still pg_dump
scripts out there that use CREATE OR REPLACE RULE "_RETURN" to adjust
view definitions.

			regards, tom lane