Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1seNAi-006Pur-Fq for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 23:12:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1seNAg-00DSam-HU for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 23:12:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1seNAg-00DSaX-8g for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 23:12:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1seNAd-004lrd-RH for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 23:12:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 47ENCj7a340245; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:12:45 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: David Rowley cc: Peter Smith , exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18558: ALTER PUBLICATION fails with unhelpful error on attempt to use system column In-reply-to: References: <18558-411bc81b03592125@postgresql.org> <2455740.1722219823@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2460423.1722222076@sss.pgh.pa.us> <335474.1723674850@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley message dated "Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:46:33 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <340243.1723677165.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:12:45 -0400 Message-ID: <340244.1723677165@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk David Rowley writes: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 10:34, Tom Lane wrote: >> It does seem mostly cosmetic, since we're just replacing one error >> message with a better one. > It's not 100% clear, but that sounds like a vote for a master-only fix. = Correct? Yes. Sorry if I was unclear. regards, tom lane