From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net>
cc: daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function
In-reply-to: <742add6c-02ac-42e4-97a3-f2ebd1520d64@Spark>
References: <ae6ed432-4491-4030-be20-3ea69d03a098@Spark>
 <790bc1f9-74dc-4b50-94d2-8147315b1556@Spark>
 <51C655A4-46FB-4A40-BAE5-26A76B31D3EE@yesql.se>
 <3052531.1741961784@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <de89bd5c-9f51-4891-8a38-d03ed06ebd1d@Spark>
 <3074065.1741965229@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <b698bb0e-766a-4255-a8c2-a1d14ef2a8f5@Spark>
 <3080651.1741969122@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <742add6c-02ac-42e4-97a3-f2ebd1520d64@Spark>
Comments: In-reply-to Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net>
	message dated "Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:32:39 -0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <3481903.1742055723.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:22:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3481904.1742055723@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3481904.1742055723%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net> writes:
> On 14 Mar 2025 at 16:18 +0000, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, wrote:
>> No, we'd need to create an update script that uses ALTER FUNCTION.
>> Extension scripts are basically frozen once shipped.

> Ah, thanks for the clarification. I=E2=80=99ve attached a patch that fix=
es the volatility. I thought it best to at least get some feedback on that=
 before I try to dust off my C knowledge and try to fix the GUC stuff.

Uh .. looks like you attached a patch for something else altogether.

If you want a sample extension-updating patch to look at, you
could see 44ba2920644903d7dfceda810e5facdbcbab58a8, or lots of
other examples.

			regards, tom lane