Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gSTT4-0001mc-I8 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gSTT3-0008Dl-47 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:03:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gSTT2-0008De-Qa for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:03:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gSTT0-00043X-1I for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:03:23 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wATL3GS1003727; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:03:16 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Jack Kelly cc: Thomas Munro , PostgreSQL mailing lists Subject: Re: BUG #15525: Build failures when compiling Postgres with Make parallelization In-reply-to: <28445.1543507385@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <15525-a30da084f17a1faa@postgresql.org> <31602.1543363896@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87k1kwlvad.fsf@jackkelly.name> <28417.1543458718@sss.pgh.pa.us> <31059.1543461919@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87r2f4jfu0.fsf@jackkelly.name> <28445.1543507385@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:03:05 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3725.1543525396.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:03:16 -0500 Message-ID: <3726.1543525396@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > After sleeping on this, I'm liking the idea of adding "touch" to our > rule better. I've pushed a patch along that line: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpostgresql.git;a=3Dpatch;h=3D826eff= 57c4c23f77314ba7151d3dc506ce0fa24c Possibly the nix PG package would want to absorb that before our next releases (which aren't scheduled until February). regards, tom lane