pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17)
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17)
@ 2025-04-16 20:21 PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
  2025-04-19 19:33 ` Re: BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: PG Bug reporting form @ 2025-04-16 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      18896
Logged by:          Dmitry Kovalenko
Email address:      d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru
PostgreSQL version: 17.4
Operating system:   Ubuntu 2024.04
Description:        

Hello,

Please, look at this code in heap_page_items function:

https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/11ff192b5bb707ba9ec13a0b6c7468874403abb3/contrib/pageinspe...

If lp_len value is less than tuphdr->t_hoff, we get a problem with negative
value in tuple_data_len

I think, we should move the code of /* Copy raw tuple data into bytea
attribute */ into the next if (.... tuphdr->t_hoff <= lp_len ....)
section.

And set nulls[13] = true; to else section here -
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/11ff192b5bb707ba9ec13a0b6c7468874403abb3/contrib/pageinspe...

-------- [copy of problem block at lines 231 ... 248]
	/* Copy raw tuple data into bytea attribute */
	tuple_data_len = lp_len - tuphdr->t_hoff;  // < -----------------
SUBSTRACT
	tuple_data_bytea = (bytea *) palloc(tuple_data_len + VARHDRSZ);
	SET_VARSIZE(tuple_data_bytea, tuple_data_len + VARHDRSZ);
	memcpy(VARDATA(tuple_data_bytea), (char *) tuphdr + tuphdr->t_hoff,
		tuple_data_len); // < ------------------- USAGE
	values[13] = PointerGetDatum(tuple_data_bytea);


	/*
	 * We already checked that the item is completely within the raw
	 * page passed to us, with the length given in the line pointer.
	 * Let's check that t_hoff doesn't point over lp_len, before using
	 * it to access t_bits and oid.
	 */
	if (tuphdr->t_hoff >= SizeofHeapTupleHeader &&
		tuphdr->t_hoff <= lp_len && // < ------------------ VERIFICATION
		tuphdr->t_hoff == MAXALIGN(tuphdr->t_hoff))
	{
--------

I hope, this problem can be fixed really easily.

Thanks&Regards,
Kovalenko Dmitry
PostgresPro, Russia.



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17)
  2025-04-16 20:21 BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17) PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
@ 2025-04-19 19:33 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-04-19 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru; +Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Please, look at this code in heap_page_items function:
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/11ff192b5bb707ba9ec13a0b6c7468874403abb3/contrib/pageinspe...
> If lp_len value is less than tuphdr->t_hoff, we get a problem with negative
> value in tuple_data_len

Yeah, you're right.

> I think, we should move the code of /* Copy raw tuple data into bytea
> attribute */ into the next if (.... tuphdr->t_hoff <= lp_len ....)
> section.

Agreed, that looks like a good fix.  I'll make it so.

			regards, tom lane





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-19 19:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-16 20:21 BUG #18896: A potential problem in heap_page_items (pageinspect, PG-17) PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
2025-04-19 19:33 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox