Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r3dx7-004tEh-Mz for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:06:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r3dx5-007PTb-Oa for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:06:43 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r3dx5-007PTO-F2 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:06:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r3dx3-006ko6-8L for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:06:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3AGF6cjm389132; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:06:38 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Aleksander Alekseev cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, James Keener Subject: Re: BUG #18097: Immutable expression not allowed in generated at In-reply-to: References: <18097-ebb179674f22932f@postgresql.org> <118FF128-C9CA-490C-8E67-65888EE8283F@jimkeener.com> <1887197.1694189299@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2250243.1694287087@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2275069.1694300202@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2502479.1699984134@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2661435.1700061355@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Aleksander Alekseev message dated "Wed, 15 Nov 2023 18:58:57 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <389129.1700147198.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:06:38 -0500 Message-ID: <389130.1700147198@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Aleksander Alekseev writes: >> True, but from the perspective of the affected code, the question is >> basically "did you call expression_planner() yet". So I like this >> naming for that connection, whereas something based on "transformation" >> doesn't really connect to anything in existing function names. > Fair enough. Pushed like that, then. Thanks for reviewing! regards, tom lane