From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marc Bachmann <marc.brookman@gmail.com>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, jeremy@musicsmith.net,
        PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel
 plan
In-reply-to: <3735893.1633232886@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <16040-eaacad11fecfb198@postgresql.org>
 <1741.1584847383@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoZvR9SP5mzH1k7MYrv3y1z4dWoJGz2z2SU-Qo1B7LrdgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1F2F75F0-27DF-406F-848D-8B50C7EEF06A@gmail.com>
 <3735893.1633232886@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	message dated "Sat, 02 Oct 2021 23:48:06 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3899522.1633281768.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 13:22:48 -0400
Message-ID: <3899523.1633281768@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3899523.1633281768%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

I wrote:
> Marc Bachmann <marc.brookman@gmail.com> writes:
>> A function that inserts data and tries to return with a table now resul=
ts in the error `query is not a SELECT`.
>> In previous versions that query succeeded.

> Hmm ... I'm a bit surprised that that worked before, but since it did,
> we shouldn't break it.

Fix pushed, thanks for the report!

			regards, tom lane