From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com>
cc: "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does
 not exist" error
In-reply-to: 
 <CAN19dyfQnRwz=+Ffnr4qfVddZDd7m7LKfuX1PmsFhYY5Z7SpQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <16991-bcaeaafa17e0a723@postgresql.org>
 <3896142.1620136761@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAN19dyfQnRwz=+Ffnr4qfVddZDd7m7LKfuX1PmsFhYY5Z7SpQw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 04 May 2021 16:29:32 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <3904664.1620138892.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 10:34:52 -0400
Message-ID: <3904665.1620138892@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3904665.1620138892%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com> writes:
> I did not come across that documented behavior while searching for regclass
> in the pg docs. The most relevant page I was able to find was the Object
> Identifier Types page that does not mention it.
> I’ll look into proposing a change in that docs page to mention it, if
> that’s the appropriate location for it.

Hmm ... I *thought* it was documented, but perhaps not.  If not,
it's likely that the other reg* types are likewise underdocumented.

			regards, tom lane