Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4ol-0001sk-W9 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:52:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4ok-00081U-JH for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:52:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4ok-00081L-7Y for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:52:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qC4oh-003Ul8-QC for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:52:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 35LKqbDC3913977; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:52:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: hughes.matt@gmail.com cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #17988: psql generates segfault when connecting to remote database In-reply-to: <17988-611e794e513ee8b8@postgresql.org> References: <17988-611e794e513ee8b8@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Bug reporting form message dated "Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:58:13 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3913975.1687380757.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:52:37 -0400 Message-ID: <3913976.1687380757@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Bug reporting form writes: > It seems like the 14.8 upgrade has caused pretty consistent segfaults when > trying to connect to any remote database. FWIW, I can't reproduce any such problem on my own MacBook Pro, nor do we have any similar reports. I suspect it may have something to do with the specific versions of support libraries (e.g. openssl) that you're linking to. It's hard to speculate profitably with so little detail, though. regards, tom lane