From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
cc: Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does
 not exist" error
In-reply-to: <41d84eb3471bd6f42384f054c04573ad5c8d7aac.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <16991-bcaeaafa17e0a723@postgresql.org>
 <3896142.1620136761@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAN19dyfQnRwz=+Ffnr4qfVddZDd7m7LKfuX1PmsFhYY5Z7SpQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3904665.1620138892@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3976561.1620170328@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <41d84eb3471bd6f42384f054c04573ad5c8d7aac.camel@cybertec.at>
Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
	message dated "Wed, 05 May 2021 09:32:14 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4026665.1620228511.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:28:31 -0400
Message-ID: <4026666.1620228511@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4026666.1620228511%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence
>> functions.  That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only
>> real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions
>> all over, not to mention other OID alias types.  I propose the attached
>> patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section.

> That patch looks good to me.
> I think it is an improvement to have that discussed under "data types".

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

			regards, tom lane