From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
cc: Peter Gigowski <gigawowski@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org,
        bruce@momjian.us
Subject: Re: pg_prepared_statements missing column
In-reply-to: <20221113125819.5nu7z4ddrj7itkq4@jrouhaud>
References: 
 <CAM7cJ6XY_PAmx0kGn6U307EKZ+qXDFEBH27WP87-_ygetnBuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221113125456.haj43yqczgodiak3@jrouhaud>
 <20221113125819.5nu7z4ddrj7itkq4@jrouhaud>
Comments: In-reply-to Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:58:19 +0800"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <403210.1668353949.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 10:39:09 -0500
Message-ID: <403211.1668353949@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/403211.1668353949%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 08:54:56PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> Indeed!  It's a documentation bug.  This was apparently an oversight
>> when packpatching 5766443695d (Bruce in Cc),

Yeah, looks that way.

> I forgot to mention that I didn't check for any other new system view
> introduced in pg16, between pg15 branching and 5766443695d.  If there we=
re they
> whould likely be present in the pg15 version of the doc too.

I did some diff'ing and couldn't identify any other discrepancies.

			regards, tom lane