Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qLTO2-003CQX-8b for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:55:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qLTO0-00DkBf-P8 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:55:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qLTO0-00DkBV-H4 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:55:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qLTNy-0017BZ-43 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:55:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 36HItoK84056489; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:55:50 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Marcel Hofstetter cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #18026: compile error / fe-auth.c:807:64: error: 'CHAR_BIT' undeclared (first use in this function) In-reply-to: References: <18026-d5bb69f79cd16203@postgresql.org> <4037095.1689610559@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Marcel Hofstetter message dated "Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:21:43 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4056487.1689620150.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:55:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4056488.1689620150@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Marcel Hofstetter writes: > Am 17.07.2023 um 18:15 schrieb Tom Lane: >> Hmm. This problem seems straightforward enough to fix, but what I >> don't understand is why we've not seen it already. We do have a >> buildfarm animal running on Solaris 11.4 [1], and it's not unhappy. > I'm the owner of margay. No idea why it works there. > buildfarm tests and building this beta2 is on the same system. [ noses around a bit... ] I see that margay uses --with-gssapi, could that be the difference? fe-auth.c pulls in a fair amount more stuff if ENABLE_GSS is set than if it isn't, though I did not check to see if is in there in particular. regards, tom lane