Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1egDuJ-0004ir-Ne for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:11:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egDuI-00024X-2D for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:11:50 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egDuH-00024N-SZ for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:11:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1egDuF-0000lP-6G for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:11:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0TIBcN3004596; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:11:39 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Tomas Vondra , "Todd A. Cook" , Thomas Munro , PostgreSQL Bugs Subject: Re: BUG #14932: SELECT DISTINCT val FROM table gets stuck in an infinite loop In-reply-to: <20180129170631.kdr2dtu5rodvovhv@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <219b37b2-d740-d04a-203a-49ae422028f7@blackducksoftware.com> <1773c302-2fb1-749f-8ccc-62b23617c5ac@blackducksoftware.com> <25629.1512580464@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20171206171923.dg7phzfh7nb4lou3@alap3.anarazel.de> <7de4b2d6-b119-7d15-04d8-4c0fcb29cbc3@2ndquadrant.com> <20180126234537.dyu6jwnqz7snpq7n@alap3.anarazel.de> <14184.1517010515@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180129010213.rt3nu73ilff756f6@alap3.anarazel.de> <3971fa24-285b-1c57-db95-b15c513162c1@2ndquadrant.com> <20180129170631.kdr2dtu5rodvovhv@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:06:31 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4594.1517249498.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:11:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4595.1517249498@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > On 2018-01-29 14:41:49 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> Do you think repeating the performance testing is necessary? Not sure >> when do you plan to push the changes, I may not have time for the tests >> until after FOSDEM. > Hm, it surely wouldn't hurt, but your previous result does give a lot of > confidence - there's not a lot of fundamental difference leaving one > more mitigation that should never reduce hashtable "quality" aside. So > I think going ahead with pushing and then benchmarking if possible, is > reasonable? Since the release wrap is this coming Monday, there's not really time to wait and do something after FOSDEM ... regards, tom lane